| These paintings were exhibited
in my solo show at the Galería René Metras in Barcelona in 1966. The paintings are
a denunciation of racial, religious and political persecution throughout history, using
Queen Isabel, King Fernando and the Spanish Inquisition as a point of departure. In
this detail of Isabel's hair we can see (not too clearly, unfortunately), images from Nazi
Germany, U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, and a racist demonstrator (behind an image of
Torquemada, the Grand Inquisitor near Isabel's ear) with a poster saying "The only
way to end Niggers is Exterminate". A great
uproar was created in the local press and in the Spanish Government when word reached them
about the paintings. James Michener describes this in his book "Iberia".
"Norman Narotzky was an American working in Barcelona, for he was
married to a girl of that city, and while I knew him a notable storm developed over a
painting of his which synthesized his reflections on Spanish history. A friend told me of
the work before I had a chance to see it for myself: 'I'm afraid Norman was ill
advised. You see he's done a pair of portraits of Fernando and Isabel and titled
them "The Catholic Kings." ' I said I thought this was appropriate
for an American, since it was these kings who had launched the discovery of our country,
but my informant said, 'I'm afraid you don't understand. The portraits, which
are really very fine, serve only as the kick-off point for what Narotzky really wants to
say. Accompanying them are symbols of religious repression through the ages.
The swastika, the crucified Christ wearing robes used by the Inquisition. It's a
real beauty! Norman has omitted nothing.
"The two paintings which I liked so much that I tried to buy them,
(Note:
eventually Michener bought the "Picasso" seen below) evoked a
scandal. A
government official pointed out that since Spain was officially sponsoring a movement to
have Isabel declared a saint, the painting was not only offensive to the nation's
historical sense but sacrilegious as well. He fulminated that his country did not
intend to sit idly by and allow intellectuals to cast aspersions on the grandeur of the
Spanish heritage... Narotzky was investigated; inquiries were made at the American
embassy; and the dealer who had exhibited the work was badgered by the police with all
sorts of hampering restrictions."
(Iberia by James A. Michener, Copyright Random
House NY 1968).
In the detail of Fernando we see, in his crown, victims
of the Holocaust in a concentration camp as well as other victims of racial, religious and
political persecution. An image of Hitler is in his eye.
At right, Isabel wears, as a necklace, tortured victims
of the Inquisition. The central figure is superimposed on an image of a concentration camp
victim.
The New York Times, Sunday, June 11, 1967, in
an article "New Pressures on the New Spanish Paintings" comments on the
government reaction to my paintings:
"...The works - coming at a moment when there was a concerted drive
to have Queen Isabel Canonized - were interpreted as direct political attacks. 'I regret
we didn't hear about the show in time to close it, Ministry of Information and Tourism's
Chief of Audio-Visual and Plastic Arts, Carlos Antonio Arean told Narotzky when he visited
the artist's studio to see the paintings.
"Subsequently, Arean publicly denounced these paintings, their
author and the gallery that showed them. In an article in Nuestro Tiempo in
March, after making a special issue of the artist's and gallery owner's foreign origins,
he went on to say: "Here in Spain...despite our alleged dictatorship, these canvases
were able to be exhibited. Clearly this will not happen again, because necessary
measures have already been taken to prevent any attack against our generous history from
slipping into any exhibition."
And indeed, at the opening of my next exhibition in
Barcelona some years later at another gallery, the owner introduced me to a man who told
me that he was a secret policeman, sent by the government to check out the show to make
sure that there was nothing offensive in it.
Carlos Arean replied to the NY Times article in
a letter to the editor published on Sunday. September 17, 1967:
"Allusion is made to my reaction to American artist Norman
Narotzky's painting of Queen Isabella the Catholic, placed on exhibition in the gallery
run by a French dealer in Barcelona.
"What Mr. Wilson omits to say is that both this painting as well as
the one of King Ferdinand of Aragon, Isabella the Catholic's husband, were blatantly
insulting. For instance, in the cleavage shown in the picture of Isabella the
Catholic, four masculine figures were to be seen sliding down inside the royal
bosom. I am sure that a similar attack, by a foreign artist residing in the United
States against any great national figure, would deserve the same rebuff as the one by the
Spaniards, including myself, who saw Narotzky's painting of our Great Queen."
|
Isabel La Católica, detail, Hair

Isabel La Católica, detail, Auto da Fe

Fernando El Católico, detail, Hat and Eye
Isabel La Católica, detail, Necklace
"...four masculine figures were to be seen sliding down inside the
royal bosom."
In this detail of Fernando's Collar we can
see a picture of the neo-nazi Lincoln Rockwell as well as images of the Ku
Klux Klan |
| The "Torquemada Retablo" was painted a year later and was never
shown in Spain. It was shown in Florence in 1967 at the "First
Intrarealist Exhibition" at the Palazzo Strozzi where it was sold to a collector from
NY. It was at this exhibition that Richard T. Hirsch, who was then the curator of
the Michener Collection saw the "Reyes Católicos" as well as my portrait of
Picasso, which, after consultation with Michener, he decided to purchase for the
Collection. |
"Torquemada Retablo", 1967 / Acrylic, 182 cms. x
137 cms. / 72" x 54".

With my wife Mercedes at the Second Intrarealist
Exhibition, O'Hana Gallery, London, 1968. My
portrait of Columbus is in the center.
|