Multidimensional reality

A discussion document.

FRONT PAGE

Photography and Digital Imaging

Gallery

Digital Info.

Web sites

Science

Society & Ethics

Metaphysics

          Consciousness

Reality Model

Holographic Model

General Information

E-mail me

 


MultDim1.jpg (20936 bytes)
 Figure 1 illustrates my interpretation of the reductionist  view.   It suggests 
that  the whole of reality is physical in nature.  The division into two parts is 
just a matter of our current understanding.  Part of  reality we do understand; 
part of it we don’t.  The division moves to the right as our understanding
grows. Whilst parts of the brain are understood,  the workings of the human
mind/brain system are not.   Thus human beings lie across the division and are
represented by the circle in the centre. 

Reductionists expect that an understanding of reality calls only for more time,
and increasingly complex applications of the set of current scientific laws.  In
particular, there are neuroscientists who maintain that the mind emerges from 
the from brain, so that all our subjective perceptions (qualia) are physical in
origin, even though we do not yet understand the mechanisms involved. 

MultDim2.jpg (32317 bytes)
Figure 2 illustrates another view, according to which there are dimensions 
other than those of space and time with which we are intimately familiar.  There is 
no agreement yet among specialists on the number of dimensions of the physical 
world.or even on the nember of spatial dimensios that we live in.
(see  Tegmark  Pitkanen and Greene).  
In any event the fabric of space is far more intricate than our senses would suggest,
and the physical world is just one special component of  a greater reality.   Science is 
cannot provide a compete picture of reality  until it can embrace the mind and 
subjective experience, and that may be never.  How can one give an objective 
description of subjective experience?   My suggestion is that the mind belongs to 
other non-physical dimensions and that it communicates with the physical brain through 
some form of interface, like a television transmitter and receiver.  See the  mathematical 
model proposed by R. P. Stanley:-
Qualia Space,  Journal Of Consciousness Studies; 6, No. 1; 1999; pp 49 - 60

 

'The interface is beyond man’s current knowledge and understanding.    In Fig. 2, 
two human beings are represented by circles which cross the boundary of spacetime, 
the brain being in the physical world, whilst the 'mind' exists in these other dimensions.  
The subjective mind is somehow partitioned from other parts of the wider reality.  It 
must be, otherwise we would be aware of everyone else’s thoughts as well as our own.    
Mystics and esoterics provide insights into the realms beyond the physical world and 
thereby provide subjective vidence for their existence.  Also the bizarre world of quantum 
theory may be pointing towards them, but there are different interpretations of quantum 
theory and these await resolution, althoiugh at this point in time there are strongly held 
and conflicting views about whether quantum theory has the potential to explain 
consciousness.
The fuzzy link between the two subjects represents such phenomena as telepathy and 
healing.   Such links are not well understood and are in empirical studie the prove to be
far less reliable than physical phenomena like electromagnetic or acoustic links.  Yet the 
evidence for this kind link between minds is strong.  Because the link is indistinct compared 
to our sensory images, it is described as fuzzy.   Healers refer to "subtle" links.  Anecdotal 
evidence of  such links is legion and evidence from scientifically conducted tests continues 
to mount.  Links to various laboratories performing scientific studies are in the section:-
According to this multidimensional model society needs to experience a major shift 
of perception in order to get a better understanding of  the wider reality.  Subjective 
experience remains outside the domain of science and whilst it dos reductionists will 
never be able to explain it. A further illustration is given in Figure 3.

 

MultDim3.jpg (29400 bytes)

Two questions:-
Science deals only with objective phenomena.
Humans experience embraces objective and subjective phenomena.
1) Does all of objective reality and all of subjective experience emerge 
from a common source?
2) Does  reality extend beyond both the domain of science and the domain 
f subjective experience?

"Panentheism" maintains that there are aspects of reality both beyond our experience
and beyond our rational understanding.  Thus ultimate reality, represented by the
ball at the base of the figure, contains a number of dimensions represented by the 
yellow band.   Nobody knows how many dimensions are involved: the number could
even be infinite.   The magenta strip represent the dimensions required to represent 
the whole of human experience, subjective and objective.  Qualia are non-physical 
items such as love, truth and beauty.  They are not in themselves dimensions, but the
suggestion is that they can be expressed in terms of fundamental dimensions, 
(R. P. Stanley, Qualia Space,  J. Consciousness Studies; 6, No. 1; 1999; pp 49 - 60)
paralleling science in this respect.   Think of vision.  There are only three primary colours
yet we can distinguish between over a million different shaded.  Perhaps feelings likewise 
have only a few primaries which give rise to our vast spectrum of experience.  The cyan 
strip represents the number of dimensions required to represent the physical world alone.  
Particle physicists and cosmologists are still developing their models but the number of 
dimensions required is  reported to be in excess of ten. The proposed  number depends 
on the model.