| Home Page | Saving | Mutual Funds | Retirement Planning | Glossary |
Investment, Speculation, and Gambling are terms often misused; select the word(s) for a definition.



In general, Stock Mutual Funds are more safe than individual Stocks; because of, primarily, diversification and professional management. A well diversified Stock Mutual Fund will have 16 or more stocks from varying industry groups. The professional management allows you to concentrate more on your job, family, and friends; instead of spending the large amount of time needed to manage a portfolio of individual stocks successfully. Having said that, some investors do well owning individual stocks. Currently, this Web site does not offer suggestions concerning individual stocks; but, some of the resources and definitions available here will help those so inclined.

Once committed to investing, you should give top priority to setting your overall asset allocation. Basically, determine what portion of your investment capital should be used in each of three general investment categories: cash, bonds (debt), or stocks (equity). As in the other portions of my Web site, when referring to stocks or bonds, mutual funds that invest in these securities are included. A traditional rule for calculating asset allocation is to subtract your age from the number 110, the result is the percentage of your total investment capital that should be in stocks; the remainder of your portfolio would be divided among the other two categories in proportions dependent on your need for income (bonds) and liquidity (cash). As an example, say you're 50 years old: 110 - 50 = 60% of overall investment capital in stocks; therefore, 40% would be left to divide between cash and bonds.
The above rule for determining asset allocation is by no means the only method currently used. I prefer to use a less rigid rule: up till age 40, 100% in stocks; at age 60 and beyond, 50% or less in stocks; between ages 40 and 60, percent in stocks is 50% to 100% determined by personal choice and situation with the caveat to begin reducing overall stock percentage below 100% by age 50. Again, as above, the remainder would be divided between cash and bonds in a manner suited to your personal needs.
Some of you may question having 50% in stocks at age 60. The reason for this, in a word, is inflation. At age 60 one may live for another 30 or more years, therefore, your nest egg's real value (if in bonds or cash alone) would likely erode over 50% by the end of that time; having a portion in stocks is a hedge against inflation.
